ABSTRACT
Objective: Evaluation of the biocompatibility of Bio-High Performance Polymer (Bio HPP) crowns veneered with Visio-Ling versus e.max crowns veneered with e.max veneering system. Material and Methods: 42 full-coverage crowns were fabricated for maxillary anterior teeth. A swap was obtained using a sterile paper cone to determine bacterial count and type. Pocket depth (PD) was determined using a William Periodontal probe. Measurements were repeated after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months respectively. Patients were randomly divided into: Group A fabricated from IPS e.max crowns and Group B fabricated from Bio HPP crowns. The preparations were standardized with an equi-gingival, finish line. Fisher's test was used to compare between the two groups. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with Windows, Version 23.0. (IBM SPSS Statistics) Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Results: Bio HPP and e.max showed no statistically significant difference in bleeding on probing and PD except after 9and 12 months; Bio HPP showed statistically significantly higher PD than e.max (P-value = 0.027, Effect size = 0.245) and (P-value = 0.011, Effect size = 0.310), respectively. Fisher's test showed there was no statistically significant difference between total bacterial counts and the type of the two materials. Conclusion: Both e.max and Bio HPP crowns revealed successful biological behavior. No significant difference between the materials regarding the bacterial count and type as well as the pocket depth, however after 9 and 12 months, Bio HPP showed a higher significant difference PD than e.max. (AU)
Objetivo: Avaliação da biocompatibilidade de coroas de Polímero Bio-High Performance (Bio HPP) estratificadas com Visio-Ling versus coroas e.max estratificadas com sistema de estratificação e.max. Material e Métodos: 42 coroas totais foram confeccionadas para dentes anteriores superiores. Uma amostra foi obtida usando um cone de papel estéril para determinar a contagem e o tipo de bactérias. A profundidade de bolsa (PD) foi determinada usando uma sonda periodontal de William. As medições foram repetidas após 3, 6, 9 e 12 meses, respectivamente. Os pacientes foram divididos aleatoriamente em: Grupo A fabricado com coroas IPS e.max e Grupo B fabricado com coroas Bio HPP. As preparações foram padronizadas com uma linha de término no nível da gengiva marginal. O teste de Fisher foi usado para comparação entre os dois grupos. O nível de significância foi estabelecido em P ≤ 0,05. A análise estatística foi realizada com Windows, versão 23.0. (IBM SPSS Statistics) Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Resultados: Bio HPP e e.max não mostraram nenhuma diferença estatisticamente significativa no sangramento à sondagem e PD, exceto após 9 e 12 meses; Bio HPP mostrou PD estatisticamente significativa maior do que e.max (valor P = 0,027, tamanho do efeito = 0,245) e (valor P = 0,011, tamanho do efeito = 0,310), respectivamente. O teste de Fisher mostrou que não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre as contagens bacterianas totais e o tipo dos dois materiais. Conclusão: As coroas e.max e Bio HPP revelaram comportamento biológico bem-sucedidos. Não houve diferença significativa entre os materiais em relação à contagem e tipo de bactérias, bem como à profundidade da bolsa, no entanto, após 9 e 12 meses, o Bio HPP apresentou uma diferença significativamente mais elevada de PD do que e.max. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Bacteria , Materials Testing , CrownsABSTRACT
Many procedures have been described for the management of symptomatic pilonidal sinus, none of which, judged by the yardsticks of primary healing and recurrence of disease, is perfect. In our study, we are trying to compare the results of two widely practiced flap techniques, the Karydakis asymmetrical unilateral sliding flap and the rhomboid transposition flap suggested by Azab et al.1984. Forty patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group was 20 patients and was treated by Karydakis flap. The second group was 20 patients and treated by rhomboid. The mean duration of symptoms was 7 months. The two groups were compared for age, sex, severity of the disease, operation time, complications and recurrence. Results and Discussion: We reported no great difference in recurrence rate [2 patients in Karydakis operation group and 1 patient in Rhomboid flap group], and also no great difference in the postoperative complications. The difference was recorded in the mean operative time [75 min in Karydakis flap group and 120 in Rhomboid flap group] and hospital stay [2 -5 days in Karydakis flap group and 7-9 days in Rhomboid flap group] and this reflects that the Rhomboid flap is more techniqually demanding procedure and so the patient usually needs to stay longer at hospital. The more complexity of the procedure explains the slight increase in the incidence of the postoperative complications